Skip to main content
KeenSafe
Pillar · Autonomous Pentesting

Agentic AI testers, running continuously

Replace the quarterly engagement with autonomous offensive agents that reason about your environment, chain ATT&CK techniques and produce reproducible evidence — without scheduling, without scope drift.

  • Production-safe by default
  • Reproducible artefacts
  • Surface-specific tradecraft
  • Human operator review for novel chains
LiveAutonomous Engine · Active
AI ORCHESTRATORagentic · adversarial · safeAGENTS · 14 ACTIVEATT&CK · TTP 213PATHS/MIN847SAFE-BY-DEFAULT
The problem

Manual pentesting cannot scale to continuous attack-surface change

Senior offensive operators are scarce, expensive and inevitably scheduled around quarters. Vulnerability scanners run continuously but cannot reason about chaining. The middle ground — continuous, reasoning-grade offensive operation — has not existed at scale.

Until now, "continuous pentesting" mostly meant scheduled scans. That is not pentesting.

The KeenSafe approach

Autonomous agents with operator-grade tradecraft

KeenSafe agents reason about your environment the way a senior offensive operator does — they discover, hypothesise, chain, exploit safely and pivot. They do not run a checklist. Each finding is a step in a chain validated end-to-end.

Human operators still set objectives and review novel paths. Agents handle the repeatable 80% — continuously.

Capabilities

What ships in this engagement

Agentic Reasoning

Agents plan attack paths from intent (reach Tier-0 from Tier-2) rather than execute prescribed playbooks.

Multi-Surface Coverage

External, internal, cloud, identity, AI/LLM and mobile — single orchestration, surface-specific tradecraft.

Production-Safe Execution

Throttling, isolation, reversible actions, scope guardrails enforced platform-wide.

Reproducible Evidence

Every action signed and replayable. No "trust me, it worked".

Novel Chain Handoff

Where agents find an unexplored chain, senior human operators take it forward — fastest in industry.

Continuous Closure

After remediation, the same path is replayed automatically. Closure provable, not asserted.

Attack path

How attackers actually move

Agents do not test "vulnerabilities". They reason about reachability — "from this Tier-2 user, what is the shortest validated chain to a Tier-0 system?" — then prove or disprove it. That is the only definition that produces actionable risk.

Validated chain

External recon → cloud token → S3

Subdomain enumerationexposed Jenkinsleaked AWS access keycrossaccount assumeroleS3 read
Business impact

4M records reachable; mapped to PCI 3.4 + GDPR Art. 32

Validated chain

Phish → workstation → ADCS ESC1 → DA

Conditional Access bypassendpoint persistencecert template abuseDomain Admin
Business impact

Full Tier-0 reach proven; ransomware blast radius modelled

Outcomes

Measurable, evidence-backed

Continuous
Operation

No scheduling. Surface drift surfaces as risk in real time.

24/7
Coverage

Agents run on cycles measured in minutes, not quarters.

More chains found

Compared to point-in-time engagements over equivalent scope.

Reproducible
All findings

Replay-deterministic evidence on every validated path.

For the board

For the security executive

Senior offensive talent is the scarcest resource in security. Autonomous pentesting is how that talent stops being the bottleneck. Agents run the repeatable work continuously; humans focus on novel chains and remediation oversight.

For the board: continuous proof — not assertion — that the security programme is closing real attack paths.

Technical validation

Inside the agent

Each agent operates a planning loop: observation → hypothesis → safe execution → evidence capture → next-state planning. ATT&CK techniques are tools, not playbooks. The agent decides which technique fits the path it is currently building.

  1. 01
    Per-engagement scope contract signed and enforced at execution time
  2. 02
    Agent discovers state, formulates hypothesis about reachable next step
  3. 03
    Production-safe execution under throttling and isolation
  4. 04
    Evidence captured, signed, fed back to planner for next step
  5. 05
    Termination on objective (chain reaches impact) or budget (scope exhausted)
Get Started

See an autonomous engagement run end-to-end

A guided 30-minute session walks through one full agent cycle on a representative environment.